Value before budget

Build a transparent business case from your own operating facts.

Represent one recurring workflow, state the change assumptions, and test a candidate investment lens. The arithmetic remains visible, editable, and entirely under your control.

Private, assumption-led planning tool

Make the value hypothesis visible before comparing a budget.

Model one operational workflow using your own volume, effort, direct cost, adoption, and investment assumptions. Nothing is submitted or saved, and no result is presented as an NNC forecast.

Directional scenario only. Capacity value is not cash savings unless the operating model changes. Validate double counting, adoption, timing, risk, taxes, financing, feasibility, and non-financial outcomes independently.

01Represent the current workflow

Start with observable activity. Use one workflow boundary so people, time, and direct cost are not counted twice.

Display currencyDisplay only. This tool performs no currency conversion.

Workflow occurrences per monthUse a representative monthly volume, not the busiest isolated period.Handling minutes per personEstimate active effort for one occurrence, excluding unattended wait time.People contributing per occurrenceCount meaningful touches; avoid counting the same effort in the minutes twice.Loaded hourly costUse salary, benefits, and relevant overhead in the selected display currency.Direct annual exception or rework costOptional. Include only documented cost not already represented by workflow labor.

02State the change assumptions

Keep technical potential separate from value the organization can realistically adopt and sustain.

Modeled capacity recoveryThe share of represented workflow effort your scenario assumes can be released.Modeled direct-cost reductionThe share of entered exception or rework cost your scenario assumes can be avoided.Realization and adoptionA separate haircut for rollout, adoption, incomplete coverage, and operating friction.

03Add a candidate investment lens

These optional amounts come from you. NNC scope, price, and operating commitments exist only in an authorized written proposal or agreement.

Candidate one-time investmentOptional buyer-entered planning amount—not an NNC estimate or quote.Candidate annual operating costOptional. Consider support, infrastructure, vendors, licenses, and internal ownership.

Transparent scenario output

What the entered assumptions imply.

Add workflow volume, handling time, contributing people, and loaded hourly cost to establish the current-state baseline.

Current-state baseline

Annual workflow hours represented: 0
Annual labor exposure at loaded cost: $0
Direct exception or rework cost entered: $0

Modeled scenario

Gross annual modeled value: $0
Recurring annual value after operating cost: $0
First-year modeled net value: $0
Three-year modeled net value: $0
Simple payback: Not established

How gross annual value is composed

Capacity value at loaded cost$0
Direct exception-cost value$0

Map delivery conditions next

Optional handoff

Turn the scenario into a reviewable decision.

Bring the verified baseline and the assumptions that need operational, financial, and delivery scrutiny.

Discuss the business case Send a detailed brief

None of your selections or result text is transferred with these links. Copy only the parts you choose to share.

This arithmetic is not a quote, valuation, forecast, guarantee, accounting conclusion, or financial advice. It does not prove that custom software is the right intervention.

Interpret the scenario

A useful model exposes assumptions—it does not hide uncertainty.

The result is only as useful as the workflow boundary and evidence behind each input. Review the model with finance, operations, users, security, and technical owners before it supports a real investment decision.

Validate the baseline.Sample actual volume, handling time, contributors, loaded cost, and exception records.
Challenge the change assumptions.Separate technical potential from rollout, adoption, policy, and behavior change.
Expand the decision.Consider customer outcomes, revenue, risk, timing, resilience, and the cost of doing nothing separately.

From model to evidence

Test the business case before treating a feature list as the answer.

Bring the verified baseline, desired outcome, and open assumptions. We can help determine whether custom software, automation, an existing product, or a smaller operating change is the responsible next path.

Discuss the Business Case Map Project Readiness